How to Win Without a Lawyer, Legal Self-Help for Pro Se Litigants

I ordered your course on May 31st, and by June 28th the lawsuit against me was "Dismissed with Prejudice." Many thanks as I was clueless until I reviewed your videos and excellent classes.

... Tracy B.
... Beltsville, Maryland

Won my appeal in the 2nd District Court in Florida because of your excellent course.

... Roger P.
... Palm Harbor, Florida

I wish I had known about your course years ago.

... Marilyn E.
... Kapaau, Hawaii

Thanks to you we are able to get the law in front of the judges and keep them honest.

... S. Rickett
... West Jordan, Utah

Your course is awesome!

... L. Price
... Melbourne, Australia

I got my child back!

... T. Taylor
... El Paso, Texas

Thank you for all that you do for us!

... Dottie C.
... Highland Beach, Florida

The case law I took to my attorneys was better than the "unpublished" document they offered as their "case law". They told me I should come to work for them! It all fell into place once I purchased your wonderfully amazing self-help course!

... Kelly J.
... Guymon, Oklahoma

You tell us thanks but We thank God for His wisdom shining forth through you.

... Kristen L.
... Canton, Michigan

Jurisdictionary has given me a greater appreciation of due process. It's amazing!

... Deron B.
... Salt Lake City, Utah

I fired my attorney 2 years ago and began using Jurisdictionary. I cornered the plaintiff and his 40 year "experienced attorney" with my demands for discovery and motions. They did not even show up for trial after chasing me 3 years to extort money in a false claim. Case closed.

... T.J.M.
... Bend, Oregon

I have been in law enforcement, have degrees in law enforcement and a para-legal degree, but by far I have learned more from you than all of them. Thank you very much.

... E. Wilson
... Jacksonville, Texas

Your website is amazing. I am devouring all of the material. Please keep up the great work.

... Jon-Paul M.
... Bolivia, North Carolina

I WON! I'm very grateful!

... Kelly W.
... Pahrump, Nevada

Keep up the great work. Thanks again so very much.

... Ronald G.
... Bellport, New York

Your course is nothing short of GENIUS!

... Geoffrey L.
... Bremerton, Washington

Your course helped me control my grandfather’s useless attorneys to file for rescission of gifts of voting stock. They told me I was wrong. I won by stopping the judge with precedent and a court reporter.

... Jeffrey M.
... Chicago, Illinois

Your course sets a second-to-none foundation to understand how the lawsuit process works. I've had several victories! My victories would not be victories, however, had it not been for your teachings.

... Sam T.
... Clearwater, Florida

The knowledge I gained from your program has greatly empowered me. I am thankful to you.

... Leah H.
... Front Royal, Virginia

Your information was an angel on my shoulder helping me through the panic phases.

... D. Christiensen
... Sherman Oaks, California

We filed a Motion to Strike Sham Complaint, like you show in your course. Two hours later the other side called to report they were dismissing the case! We were so happy we were crying with joy. We won! I cannot thank you enough for making it simple to follow.

... Tyler G.
... Olympia, Washington

I have learned more with your course in the past few days than I have learned in the rest of my life, and I am not a young man anymore.

... D. Parker
... Alta Loma, California

I've learned so much that I decided to run for the U.S. Senate seat here. Your course gives me confidence I can be a lawmaker who knows how law is supposed to work.

... Rob T.
... Cumberland, Wisconsin

Thanks to your Jurisdictionary site, I learned so much that I won favor with the Magistrate and he ruled favorably on every motion I filed. I thank God for your web site, and thank you too!

... U. Lowe
... Cincinnati, Ohio

Anyone would have to be a fool not to take your course. Thanks for revealing the tactics I needed to win! I'm a free man!

... D. Moyers
... Covington, Georgia

Bought Jurisdictionary and am extremely pleased with it.

... Sharon W.
... Pahoa, Hawaii

A guide to the rules attorneys follow in civil lawsuits.

... The Charlotte Observer
... Charlotte, North Carolina

I won my case in the Alaska Supreme Court against my Borough government in support of local citizens' right to petition government through the initiative and referendum process. Jurisidictionary helped me understand the concepts necessary to prevail.

... James P.
... Nikiski, Alaska

Always shall you have my greatest respect and admiration.

... Suzanne A,
... Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

I finally decided to invest in the program and start to learn "How to Win in Court"! Your program saved me. Learning the rules of court make a difference! The HOA dropped the case. Thank you for everything! I now can start my life over after 10 years of unfounded harassment from greedy people who don't care! The only regret is I did not order your program sooner.

... Becca C.
... Tampa, Florida

I have had so many attorneys take my money and leave me without representation. NEVER AGAIN! My family and I appreciate all you do. God bless you.

... Patricia M.
... Birmingham, Alabama

I am extremely grateful to you for assisting me to resolve my legal battles with your outstanding law course. It feels really good to have stood my ground aggressively and, as you said, chopping them off at the knees so they can't get back up!

... Gary K.
... Jacksonville, Florida

You are one in a million!

... Louis D.
... Mesa, Arizona

I want to testify to how comprehensive your course is. I was amazed how sound and easy to understand your lessons are. Used your method to force the other side to produce contract they claimed I breached. When they could not, I filed a motion to dismiss their case. They settled. Thanks for your course!

... Joseph R.
... Miami, Florida

I took on the City of Omaha and won. I was featured on a popular radio show to give proof "one man can defeat City Hall". Thank you!

... John M.
... Omaha, Nebraska

I appreciate you and the very valuable training you offer. I will work very hard to ensure the word is spread.

... A. Whitmore
... Las Vegas, Nevada

Your Course is GREAT!

... Ramsay D.
... Simi Valley, California

You have helped me a great deal at a time when i could have lost everything i worked for these last thirty years. You have enlightened me with Armor of new education, I never knew I would some day need.

... Milanko, D.
... Lake Geneva, Wisconsin

Jurisdictionary WORKS! Won against a powerful attorney. Even the other attorneys in the gallery were talking about it.

... K. Anderson
... Huntersville, North Carolina

Thanks for keeping the course going all these years!

... D. Williams
... Port Angelew, Washington

Tender: An offer to transfer possession of something to someone else (e.g., tender of payment of rent or return to your neighbor of a borrowed set of golf clubs). One is said to have tendered when the offer is made with the present ability and intent to complete the transfer.; Take a look at a dollar bill (or any other denomination) and you’ll see written thereon, "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private," meaning you can tender the bill to pay any private or public debt, and the party to whom it is tendered cannot refuse receiving payment thereby (at least in the U.S.).; The interesting thing about tender is that it need not be accepted! Whether the tender is accepted or not, tender is still made if the offer to transfer has been extended in a reasonable manner indicating the present ability and willingness to complete the transfer. One may tender payment of rent (return of a borrowed set of golf clubs, for example) and the other party refuse to accept, in which case tender has been made, regardless of acceptance, and our courts will recognize the offer and adjudge the respective rights of the parties accordingly.
Testamentary: Of or pertaining to wills or other instruments intended to be operative only upon the death of the person executing them.
Testamentary Capacity: The ability to understand the nature and extent of what one owns at the time of making a will and also to at least understand who the rest of the world might consider to be those persons naturally entitled to receive the benefit that will be conferred by the will at death (whether or not those persons are named in the will to receive a bounty from the testator or testatrix as beneficiaries) One may have testamentary capacity and be delusional to the point of believing their are pixies playing trombones in the trees, so long as the person knows generally what he or she possesses and knows who the rest of the world would normally expect to receive a benefit from the will when the person dies. In most states, persons under guardianship lack testamentary capacity as a matter of law.
Testator: The term used to refer to a man who executes a will.
Testatrix: The term used to refer to a woman (or girl) who executes a will.
Testify: To give testimony.
Testimony: Any statement made before the court (including testimony taken at a deposition). In most cases this word refers to sworn verbal statements made by witnesses appearing in the courtroom to give evidence, however technically any statement made in a proceeding before the court is testimony. Lawyers, for example, may attempt to give testimony while they interrogate a witness. Leading the witness is one of the common ways this is done, and it is acceptable practice. Sometimes, however, a lawyer will speak to the jury, telling them what happened on such and such a day when the lawyer was nowhere around. This kind of testimony is not acceptable and can, in eggregious cases (i.e., extreme) be cause for the court’s declaring a mistrial. Testimony should only be considered reliable when given by a person who is first sworn or affirmed and has first-hand knowledge of the facts alleged.
Theft: Intentionally obtaining possession of property that belongs to someone else (even if only temporarily) is theft. Of course taking any kind of property (money, car, book, or even a pencil) with intent never to return it, is also theft. It’s theft, whether or not you intend to "give it back". Taking your friend’s car for a joy ride (even if you intend only a single trip round the block) is theft. Borrowing money from mom’s purse without permission (even though you intend to pay her back) is theft. It’s a crime and also a civil wrong for which you can be sued on a cause of action called civil theft. Not only can you go to prison, but you can be required to pay the person back and, in some civil courts, theft victims are awarded judgment for the value of the thing stolen plus three-times its value as a penalty together with all their attorney&rss fees and costs. Finally, the fact that you offer to pay a person back or are required to pay them back together with treble damages, you can still go to jail. Restitution is no defense.
Title: The right to property, real property or personal property. Title is also the name of certain documents (e.g., automobile or boat title) that grant the right of ownership to property.
Tort: A civil wrong, either negligent or intentional, that results in damages to another. Torts arise from the breach of a duty that does not derive from contract obligations. Examples are fraud, deceit, conversion, breach of trust.
Tortious Interference: Malicious, intentional influence of the customers or employees of another causing loss of business. The complete term is "tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship". See tort.
Tribunal: Today this is just another word for the court, i.e., the judge or judges on the bench, regardless of the number of judges. Nearly all lower courts are presided over by only one judge or magistrate. In many state appellate courts decisions are made by a panel of three judges. Exceptional cases may be decided by five appellate court judges. The United States Supreme Court often sits as a panel of nine justices. The term tribunal is commonly applied regardless of the number presiding.; The term derives from days of long ago when capital and other highly critical cases were decided by three judges, instead of only one, to offset the risk of human bias and promote justice.
Trier of Fact: The trier of fact in a civil case may be a jury, a judge, or a panel of judges. In a jury trial, the panel of jurors is given the responsibility to rule as to which side should be believed in regard to the facts presented ... however, the jury never is relied upon to decide the application of law, which is always left to the judge or a panel of judges.; In a non-jury trial (e.g., probate and guardianship proceedings in states like Florida or bankruptcy proceedings in federal court) the judge (or a panel of judges) decides matters of fact and application of law to the decided facts.; Usually, decisions of the trier of facts are not overturned except in the egregious circumstances when the lower court may be reversed by an appellate tribunal, i.e., lower court decisions in regard to the reliability of evidence presented are seldom overturned unless there has been a clear abuse of judgment that justice cannot abide.
True: A statement is either true or it is false. If true it contains only allegation of truth. If the statement contains any allegation that does not fall into restricted category known as truth, then the entire statement is deemed false in a court of law. In other words, a true statement contains no falsehood whatsoever.
Trust: Trust is the faith, i.e., the confidence, one person places in another. Without it, the civilized world and all its enterprises would grind to a frightening standstill. Nearly every human endeavor imaginable depends in one way or another on trust. The responsibility entrusted to the person in whom trust is reposed is called a fiduciary duty, i.e., the duty of good faith.; A trust is also a legal entity that is treated in the contemplation of law as an individual person able to hold and manage property, to prosecute and answer lawsuits, and to carry out the business and financial activities that an individual human being might be able to do in his own name. Every trust has at least five "identities": (1) a grantor (sometimes called the trustor) who creates the trust initially, (2) a trustee into whose care and keeping the property of the trust is committed, (3) the property itself (sometimes called the corpus), (4) at least one identified beneficiary, and (5) a declaration of some sort (preferably written and subscribed with the necessary formalities to make it enforceable in a court of law) by which the world is put on notice of the terms and conditions by which the trustee is to hold and manage the money for the use and benefit of the beneficiaries.; Though a trust is treated as a separate individual (e.g., may be required to pay taxes), the actual business of a trust is always handled by a trustee who holds legal title to the trust property, while the equitable (use and benefit) title resides in the named beneficiaries.; When a trust sues or is sued in court, the trustee appears on its behalf and, in most jurisdictions, is required to appear by an attorney rather than individually.; Drafters of trust documents should be careful not to declare a trust that would survive any of the named persons by 21 years or more, for to do so would void the trust in most jurisdictions for violation of the public interest rule against perpetuities. In other words, no valid trust can be created in most jurisdictions if the trust will survive the named persons by 21 years or more, and trusts that attempt to violate this rule against perpetuities may be declared ineffective nullities.
Truth: Truth is that which is. Truth includes what was and what is yet to be. Truth is the sum of all facts. Truth is not subject to interpretation or opinion though, certainly, there is no shortage of human views of what is truth and what truth is not. In spite of all opinion, truth is not subject to human views. Truth exists even where no human ever ventured. Truth was in the beginning and will endure beyond the end.; No false thing is ever true.; No truth is ever false.; Truth is the litigant’s most powerful tool. Cling to it. Insist upon it in your lawsuit. Demand it from your adversaries, and compel the court to permit no deviations.; Lawsuits should be decided solely upon the merits of the law and facts.; No lie has any place in the deliberations of justice.; Let truth alone guide our courts.

Know how to win!

Optimized for Smartphones, Tablets, and Computers.