You are one in a million!

... Louis D.
... Mesa, Arizona

I have your complete course and have found it to be the most rewarding study of law I have ever read.

... Dan C.
... Denver, Colorado

I ordered your course on May 31st, and by June 28th the lawsuit against me was "Dismissed with Prejudice." Many thanks as I was clueless until I reviewed your videos and excellent classes.

... Tracy B.
... Beltsville, Maryland

Just wanted to say thank you for all the hard work you have certainty put into creating this one of a kind program. I can only imagine how may people it has helped who have taken the time to check into it.

... Pandora E.
... Scottsdale, Arizona

The opposing party dismissed their case against me. Thank you for the knowledge and insight you provided through your course.

... Gerald C.
... Tucker, Georgia

Got my second win in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Thanks.

... Sonny S.
... Brooklyn, New York

Jurisdictionary WORKS! Won against a powerful attorney. Even the other attorneys in the gallery were talking about it.

... K. Anderson
... Huntersville, North Carolina

Thank you for your hard labor and mission. Well done!

... Steven W.
... Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

I have YOU to thank for your wonderful course. I re-hear, re-watch, and re-read the course. The more I do, the more certainty and confidence I gain.

... J. Patterson
... Arlington, WA

Your course helped me control my grandfather’s useless attorneys to file for rescission of gifts of voting stock. They told me I was wrong. I won by stopping the judge with precedent and a court reporter.

... Jeffrey M.
... Chicago, Illinois

Your course is awesome!

... L. Price
... Melbourne, Australia

Settled my case! Without your course I would never have gotten to 1st base.

... Larry S.
... Orlando, Florida

This course is absolutely needed for personal enlightenment and navigating through many difficult situations...it builds confidence to ask the right questions. I refer to it often mentally and visit the site to gain clarity.

... Halina B.
... Depew, New York

I have learned more in the last few days than I could have in years on my budget.

... David P.
... Alta Loma, California

I won $11,000 lawsuit against a bank by using your course. I was amazed how easy it is to understand! It gave me confidence. The bank's case was dismissed with prejudice! Thank you for making a great course. I got back much more than the cost. I got back my dignity! God bless you!

... Reynaldo N.
... Mundelein, Illinois

Thank you for all that you do!

... Jon M.
... Bolivia, North Carolina

I tell people about your services as though it's the gospel. Your course is answer to a prayer I've had a long time.

... Charles S.
... Houston, Texas

Jurisdictionary has given me the strength and confidence to go before the courts.

... Adrienne M.
... Mullingar, Ireland

Thank you for all that you do for us!

... Dottie C.
... Highland Beach, Florida

I have been using your program for four years and have won every case. Keep up the amazing work!

... John M.
... Phoenix City, Alabama

This course is extremely valuable and helped me tremendously to understand how to win.

... Christina W.
... Sarasota, Florida

I have been using your program for four years and have won every case. Keep up the amazing work!

... John M.
... Phenix City, Alabama

I have been in law enforcement, have degrees in law enforcement and a para-legal degree, but by far I have learned more from you than all of them. Thank you very much.

... E. Wilson
... Jacksonville, Texas

Ordered your course. Followed your plan. Other side had 3 attorneys. Cleaned their clock using your methods. Their case came down like a ton of bricks when I proved their elements were not there. Thank you!

... Michael L.
... Springville, New York

Another victory! They backed off as soon as they received my demands! You are a prayer answered from the Lord!

... Sam T.
... Dallas, Texas

Jurisdictionary, in my opinion, is the best investment you will ever make: investing in your own "Legal Education" and it works, I promise!!!

... Don H.
... Atlanta, Georgia

Because of the education received in your course, I stayed on top. Neither the courts nor the bank could knock me out.

... Holly M.
... Arvada, Colorado

The case law I took to my attorneys was better than the "unpublished" document they offered as their "case law". They told me I should come to work for them! It all fell into place once I purchased your wonderfully amazing self-help course!

... Kelly J.
... Guymon, Oklahoma

Won my appeal in the 2nd District Court in Florida because of your excellent course.

... Roger P.
... Palm Harbor, Florida

I ordered your course several weeks ago and am really enjoying the fact that I understand the legal process better than I ever thought I could. Your materials and teaching style are great and very easy to follow.

... Allan D.
... Brainerd, Minnesota

Your Course is GREAT!

... Ramsay D.
... Simi Valley, California

Your information was an angel on my shoulder helping me through the panic phases.

... D. Christiensen
... Sherman Oaks, California

Won 4 motions in court yesterday. Wish I had your tutorials a year ago!

... Linda S.
... Roswell, Georgia

We filed a Motion to Strike Sham Complaint, like you show in your course. Two hours later the other side called to report they were dismissing the case! We were so happy we were crying with joy. We won! I cannot thank you enough for making it simple to follow.

... Tyler G.
... Olympia, Washington

I took on the City of Omaha and won. I was featured on a popular radio show to give proof "one man can defeat City Hall". Thank you!

... John M.
... Omaha, Nebraska

Your cause is urgently important.

... William M.
... Northfield, Minnesota

I fired my attorney 2 years ago and began using Jurisdictionary. I cornered the plaintiff and his 40 year "experienced attorney" with my demands for discovery and motions. They did not even show up for trial after chasing me 3 years to extort money in a false claim. Case closed.

... T.J.M.
... Bend, Oregon

I am extremely grateful to you for assisting me to resolve my legal battles with your outstanding law course. It feels really good to have stood my ground aggressively and, as you said, chopping them off at the knees so they can't get back up!

... Gary K.
... Jacksonville, Florida

Your course sets a second-to-none foundation to understand how the lawsuit process works. I've had several victories! My victories would not be victories, however, had it not been for your teachings.

... Sam T.
... Clearwater, Florida

Thanks to you we are able to get the law in front of the judges and keep them honest.

... S. Rickett
... West Jordan, Utah

Course Contents

Everything Included - Only $249

Main Menu

References

Waiver: A voluntary, deemed, or assumed abandonment of some right. In many proceedings, if no objection is raised to an act of the opposing party, the court may deem that a waiver has occurred. The longer one delays acting, the more likely the court will impose a waiver. Of course a waiver can be voluntary and express, as when one waives his right to cross-examine a witness.
Ward: One who is in the custody of another. A prisoner is ward of his warden. A person under the protection of a court-ordered guardianship is ward of his guardian. An orphan is generally a ward of the state or of the institution responsible for the orphan’s custody and welfare. Children who are not orphans or abandoned to the state are usually in the custody of and therefore wards of one or both of their parents.; A ward is not necessarily under the complete control of another, but someone other than the ward is always legally responsible for the ward’s welfare and, therefore, that person is legally answerable to the state in regard to the ward’s welfare.
Willful: With intent, i.e., intending to take an action rather than doing so accidentially.; "She entered the plaintiff’s property willfully, in spite of the ‘No Trespassing’ sign she admitted seeing before she crossed the boundary."; The issue of "intent" often determines whether or not a person is liable for damages resulting from his or her acts. If the act is unintentional (, i.e., not willful) there may in some cases be no liability, while if intentional (willful) the actor may be responsible for not only the plaintiff’s actual damages but also for punitive damages to punish him or her for having either an evil intent or reckless disregard for the consequences to others.; Keep in mind it is the intent to do the act that counts, not intent to cause the injury. If one intends an act (i.e., if he acts willfully) then he is responsible for the plaintiff’s damages - whether or not he intended to cause damages.
With Prejudice: When a notice or offer or admission is made with prejudice, the party giving the notice, offer, or admission is bound by the consequence. For example, if a party dismisses his lawsuit with prejudice he cannot re-file against any of the same parties upon the same causes of action arising from the same or even similar fact circumstances. By filing a "Notice Of Dismissal With Prejudice" he waives all rights he might otherwise have had to re-file the lawsuit at a later time. Whenever you are settling with another party who, in consideration of some payment or agreement, promises to dismiss his lawsuit against you, make certain he does so "with prejudice" and that his notice of dismissal includes those very words. See Without Prejudice next.
Without Prejudice: When a notice or offer or admission is made "without prejudice", the party giving the notice, offer, or admission is not bound by the consequence. For example, if a party dismisses his lawsuit without prejudice he may re-file against any of the same parties on the same causes of action arising from the same or similar fact circumstances. By filing a "Notice Of Dismissal Withour Prejudice" he does not waive his right to re-file the lawsuit at a later time. Whenever you are settling with another party who, in consideration of some payment or agreement, requests you to dismiss your lawsuit against him, and you have any doubt as to whether or not he will follow-through on the promises he made to get you to dismiss the suit, do so "without prejudice" and make certain you notice of dismissal includes those very words. Then, if he doesn’t do what he promised, you can file the lawsuit again.; A surprising number of people list their mailing address in various peculiar ways ending with the words "without prejudice", presumably because they think giving their mailing address somehow binds them to some obligation, however inasmuch as listing one’s mailing address has no legal consequence other than the hoped for possibility you may receive your mail at that address, adding "without prejudice" has no effect other than to label the person as a bit peculiar.
Writ: An order of the court enforcing the law or its separate orders by directing that some act be performed, as opposed to an order of judgment declaring a debt (as in a case for damages in tort or breach of contract) or enjoining some future action (as in a case to enforce the terms of an agreement or to prevent one person from causing or threatening harm to another). There were in the common law many different types of writs. A few still in use are listed hereinafter. Writs are obtained by motions or petitions to a court having jurisdiction over the matter.
Writ of Assistance: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a sheriff) to enforce a prior writ or other order of the court.
Writ of Attachment: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a sheriff) to attach property obtained by fraud for delivery to the person rightfully entitled to possession.
Writ of Certiorari: A writ ordering certification (i.e., examination) of the rulings of a lower court during proceedings at the trial level. When an aggrieved party believes during the proceedings of his case that the lower court has violated the rules of court, for example, he or she may petition the higher court for a writ of certiorari to examine what the lower court has done and, if the appellate court finds there has been an abuse of power or abuse of discretion, an order may be issued reversing the lower court’s decision or remanding the matter back to the trial judge for further proceedings consistent with the appellate court’s ruling.
Writ of Execution: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a sheriff or U.S. Marshal) to levy on the property of a person (usually a judgment debtor), to sell same, and to return to the court documentation showing sums recovered therefrom.
Writ of Garnishment: A writ ordering a person or business entitity (e.g., employer) owing money to a judgment debtor to pay that money to the judgment creditor instead.; When a party wins a judgment for money damages against another who is owed money by a third person (e.g., employer or person obligated to the debtor pursuant to a promissory note or other contract) the court can order the third person to pay the judgment creditor until the judgment is satisfied.; Writs of garnishment may be issued to banks holding cash in accounts of the judgment debtor or to employers of the judgment debtor.; If the amount an employer owes is insufficient to satisfy the judgment, a continuing writ may be issued directing the employer to withdraw all but a set minimum sum from the employee&rss wages each pay period, paying the employee the minimum amount and paying the rest of the debtor’s wages to the judgment creditor until the judgment is satisfied.
Writ of Habeas Corpus: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a warden, sheriff, or local police officer holding a prisoner) to give answer on the public record explaining by what authority he or she is holding the prisoner (e.g., "having the body") in detention. Motions for writs of habeas corpus are used to challenge the right of the state to continue detaining a prisoner. In some situations an individual may be imprisoned after conviction and there is later discovered evidence to be brought before the court, or the conviction may have resulted from a judge’s abuse of discretion. An accused may be wrongfully sentenced to serve a term longer than the law provides, and the writ will bring this fact before the court to re-examine the sentence. The writ has been used to challenge the conditions of detention centers, requiring that such conditions be improved or the detention center closed.
Writ of Mandamus: A writ ordering a government official (regardless of branch or level) to give an answer on the public record explaining by what authority he or she is acting in a particular situation or requiring such person to act in accordance with his or her lawful authority. Thus, if the mayor of a town refuses to convene the city council, an aggrieved citizen can move the local court of competent jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus requiring the mayor to act in accordance with his or her legal function. Or, if the mayor takes it upon himself or herself to act as a judge and jury, directing the local police chief to put people in jail at his or her command, a motion for writ of mandamus will move the court to issue an order directing the mayor to explain by what authority he or she is having people jailed without due process of law.
Writ of Possession: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a sheriff) to give possession of property to the person lawfully entitled to possession and, if necessary to remove the offending party by force.
Writ of Prohibition: An extraordinary writ issued by a higher court ordering a lower court to act according to law or to desist acting contrary to law.
Writ of Quo Warranto: A writ ordering a government official (regardless of branch or level) to give an answer on the public record explaining by what authority he or she is acting in a particular situation. Thus, if the mayor of a town takes it upon himself or herself to act as a judge, directing local police to put people in jail at his or her command, a motion for writ of quo warranto will move the court to issue an order directing the mayor to explain by what authority he or she is having people jailed without due process of law.
Writ of Replevin: A writ ordering a law enforcement officer (e.g., a sheriff) to recover personal property from one person and give it to another. When one person is wrongfully in possession of the property of another (e.g., by theft or default on a rental contract) the aggrieved party can petition the court for a writ of replevin to test the right of the party in possession and, if justice demands, to authorize the exercise of legal force to recover the wrongfully detained property.

Know how to represent yourself in court!

Works with Computers, Tablets, and Smartphones.