I have your course, and it is truly a blessing.

... Debra M.
... Montgomery, Maryland

I won $11,000 lawsuit against a bank by using your course. I was amazed how easy it is to understand! It gave me confidence. The bank's case was dismissed with prejudice! Thank you for making a great course. I got back much more than the cost. I got back my dignity! God bless you!

... Reynaldo N.
... Mundelein, Illinois

I've learned more from you than from any law classes that I've attended.

... Danny G.
... Janesville, Wisconsin

I appreciate what you have done for society as a whole. I will be spreading the word for sure and getting this valuable info into as many hands as possible!

... Richard V.
... Hollywood, Florida

Your Course is GREAT!

... Ramsay D.
... Simi Valley, California

I have been using your program for four years and have won every case. Keep up the amazing work!

... John M.
... Phenix City, Alabama

Jurisdictionary WORKS! Won against a powerful attorney. Even the other attorneys in the gallery were talking about it.

... K. Anderson
... Huntersville, North Carolina

I bought your course, and it paid off!

... Ruben P.
... Miami, Florida

Defeated a 35-year veteran lawyer I've been fighting the last 3 years. Most of this victory is credited to your course. I can't thank you enough.

... Bill J.
... Columbus, Ohio

I have your course. I wish I had a picture of the opposing attorney when I objected to his attempt to get an affidavit admitted! Thanks!

... B.J.H.
... Pasadena, Maryland

Jurisdictionary, in my opinion, is the best investment you will ever make: investing in your own "Legal Education" and it works, I promise!!!

... Don H.
... Atlanta, Georgia

I have been in law enforcement, have degrees in law enforcement and a para-legal degree, but by far I have learned more from you than all of them. Thank you very much.

... E. Wilson
... Jacksonville, Texas

I am extremely grateful to you for assisting me to resolve my legal battles with your outstanding law course. It feels really good to have stood my ground aggressively and, as you said, chopping them off at the knees so they can't get back up!

... Gary K.
... Jacksonville, Florida

Won unemployment benefits hearing on my own. Without your Jurisdictionay training, I would not have been effective. The course paid for itself. Your course is a blessing.

... Ben J.
... Los Angeles, California

Your course is nothing short of GENIUS!

... Geoffrey L.
... Bremerton, Washington

I consider you a hero for the course you've produced and the heart reasoning that prompted you to do it.

... Ivanov P.
... Homestead, Florida

I have learned more in the last few days than I could have in years on my budget.

... David P.
... Alta Loma, California

I truly love the course! I've kicked myself for not getting it sooner. Your information is putting all the puzzle together for me. The work you are doing is awesome!

... Charles H.
... Winchester, Tennessee

Thank you for your guidance and the time and effort you've put into the American Dream.

... Andrea M.
... Brunswick, Maine

This course is absolutely needed for personal enlightenment and navigating through many difficult situations...it builds confidence to ask the right questions. I refer to it often mentally and visit the site to gain clarity.

... Halina B.
... Depew, New York

Since learning from your course my life has changed for the better, and I am finally in control of my formerly overwhelming legal problems.

... Harold C.
... Jersey City, New Jersey

Escaped a 65 year prison sentence. I owe Jurisdictionary a great deal. Because of you, I was able to control a kangaroo court, well known for its corruption. I was not guilty!

... Jimmy D.
... Menlo Park, California

I have your complete course and have found it to be the most rewarding study of law I have ever read.

... Dan C.
... Denver, Colorado

I won my case in the Alaska Supreme Court against my Borough government in support of local citizens' right to petition government through the initiative and referendum process. Jurisidictionary helped me understand the concepts necessary to prevail.

... James P.
... Nikiski, Alaska

I have learned more with your course in the past few days than I have learned in the rest of my life, and I am not a young man anymore.

... D. Parker
... Alta Loma, California

Got my second win in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Thanks.

... Sonny S.
... Brooklyn, New York

You have helped me a great deal at a time when i could have lost everything i worked for these last thirty years. You have enlightened me with Armor of new education, I never knew I would some day need.

... Milanko, D.
... Lake Geneva, Wisconsin

Your website is amazing. I am devouring all of the material. Please keep up the great work.

... Jon-Paul M.
... Bolivia, North Carolina

I won a criminal case at trial with two lying witnesses against me. I got Jurisdictionary and learned that law works if it's used correctly. The judge read my memorandum and agreed with me. The most wonderful feeling I ever felt was walking out of that courtroom knowing I won without a lawyer!

... Philip J.
... Albany, Georgia

Thanks. Your course is in a class by itself and a remarkable tutor.

... Sam S.
... Coronado, California

Your information was an angel on my shoulder helping me through the panic phases.

... D. Christiensen
... Sherman Oaks, California

You have taught me so much knowledge and law. I will help you no matter what.

... P. Bui
... Westminster, California

It took 8 years and my representing myself in 5 different courts, but I finally won the rest of my lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court of Appeals. Thank you and God Bless You.

... S. Zito
... Harpersfield, New York

Jurisdictionary has given me the strength and confidence to go before the courts.

... Adrienne M.
... Mullingar, Ireland

Ordered your course. Followed your plan. Other side had 3 attorneys. Cleaned their clock using your methods. Their case came down like a ton of bricks when I proved their elements were not there. Thank you!

... Michael L.
... Springville, New York

Thank you for creating your course, "How to Win in Court", and thank you for providing the content at the level you do.

... Dan N.
... Ranier, Oregon

I truly do appreciate the work you do and the information you provide as this is a great service to "all" citizens. Certainly more "legal information" is needed to increase "legal literacy" in the world today. I am amazed that you are able to respond so quickly given your "one man" operation. The "legacy" you are leaving by promoting "legal education" is important to this generation as well as future generations and I commend you for your efforts to impart of your knowledge.

... Leonard S.
... Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Won my appeal in the 2nd District Court in Florida because of your excellent course.

... Roger P.
... Palm Harbor, Florida

I call it "empowering the people" when I preach Jurisdictionary!

... Charlie H.
... Haw River, North Carolina

Thanks for all the hard work you have put into the course!

... A. Varella
... San Antonio, Texas

Thanks to your Jurisdictionary site, I learned so much that I won favor with the Magistrate and he ruled favorably on every motion I filed. I thank God for your web site, and thank you too!

... U. Lowe
... Cincinnati, Ohio

Bought Jurisdictionary and am extremely pleased with it.

... Sharon W.
... Pahoa, Hawaii

I appreciate you and the very valuable training you offer. I will work very hard to ensure the word is spread.

... A. Whitmore
... Las Vegas, Nevada

A guide to the rules attorneys follow in civil lawsuits.

... The Charlotte Observer
... Charlotte, North Carolina

Your course sets a second-to-none foundation to understand how the lawsuit process works. I've had several victories! My victories would not be victories, however, had it not been for your teachings.

... Sam T.
... Clearwater, Florida

You are completely brilliant. I have never seen/read anything like this. I am eager to get this information out to help others like me. Thank you.

... Sylvia C.
... Kula, Hawaii

I got my child back!

... T. Taylor
... El Paso, Texas

Thank you for your hard labor and mission. Well done!

... Steven W.
... Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Settled my case! Without your course I would never have gotten to 1st base.

... Larry S.
... Orlando, Florida

Your course helped me control my grandfather’s useless attorneys to file for rescission of gifts of voting stock. They told me I was wrong. I won by stopping the judge with precedent and a court reporter.

... Jeffrey M.
... Chicago, Illinois

Thank you so very much for making litigation knowledge a REAL opportunity to take advantage of.

... Charles S.
... Houston, Texas

Won 4 motions in court yesterday. Wish I had your tutorials a year ago!

... Linda S.
... Roswell, Georgia

Course Contents

Click Buttons Below for Previews

Main Menu

References

Mala Fides: Bad faith. The opposite of bona fides, good faith. From mala for bad (where we get the words malefactor, malicious, etc.) and fides for faith (where we get the word fidelity).
Mandamus: A writ or court order directing a public official to perform his official duty. A writ of mandamus may be used, for example, to force a mayor to attend his town hall meetings or to require the clerk of court to give you access to a file that is part of the local public records. Mandamus from a higher court can be used to cause a lower court to enter an order instead of continuing to sit on your case. Mandamus can direct any public official, any branch. The President of the United States should be subject to mandamus by the U.S. Supreme Court, and every judge, governor, lieutenant governor, comptroller, court clerk, sheriff, and all other officers of each state should be subject to the mandamus of their state’s supreme court. Mandamus is a very powerful writ. The power of mandamus issues only by a court, however it belongs to the people. The power is yours. You have a right to ask the court to issue a writ of mandamus for you anytime a situation warrants it. If you need to, you can use your mandamus power to make leaders do what their Constitutional job descriptions require of them. Make your school board do its job. Here’s how. Get a writ of mandamus requiring them to do it. State Attorney’s office won’t act? Go to court. Complain for a writ of mandamus. Make public officials do their jobs. Use your pen power to move mountains. See Writ of Mandamus.
Material: A fact is material if it is necessary to or can affect the outcome of a case. If a fact is not necessary and cannot affect the outcome of the case it is not material to the case. See also relevant, pertinent, and dispositive.
Materiality: The materiality of a fact is the degree to which such fact is or is not material. Frequently, during the course of a lawsuit, one party argues the materiality of facts offered by the other side as evidence. If the court finds an offered fact is not material, it cannot be used as evidence in the proceedings.
Mediation: A quasi-judicial process by which the parties meet to seek a mutually agreeable result to their dispute. If the parties agree, the mediator will prepare a mediation agreement for the parties to sign. Both parties must appear for mediation or be represented by persons empowered to settle fully. If the mediation agreement is signed, the mediator will present it to the court, and an order will be entered binding the parties to their agreement. If the parties do not reach and agreement, the mediation is said to be at a impasse, and the parties are left to take their dispute to court. The best preparation for mediation is to know as much as possible about the law and facts prior to attending the mediation conference.; Remember this: You are not required to settle with the other side. If the terms are not agreeable, tell the mediator you cannot agree to the terms, and the mediator will report to the judge that you and your opponent have met an impasse and cannot find room for agreement.
Meeting of the Minds: In settling disputes over contracts, courts may look to see if parties were in actual agreement, if there was a genuine meeting of the minds ... for unless there is agreement there is no contract.; If, for example, a painter reasonably believes a contract required him to paint the barn red (i.e., if such an interpretation can be reasonably read from the parties’ agreement) and the farmer reasonably believed his barn was to be painted blue (i.e., that the contrary interpretation was also reasonable), the court may relieve the parties of their obligation on the basis that there was no meeting of the minds and try to assist the parties to find some mutual ground for resolving their difficulty.; If there is no actual meeting of the minds, there can be no enforceable contract, for contracts are only enforceable by our courts if both parties agreed to the same thing. The word "agreement" is synonymous in the law with "contract". See informed consent.
Memorandum: A detailed argument for or against a motion, usually stating the material facts and citations to controlling law. Plural is memoranda. See Brief.
Misdemeanor: A breach of public law that may require a fine but does not deprive the accused of his civil rights. Conviction on misdemeanor charges does not authorize incarceration, forfeiture of property (other than the fine), nor otherwise authorize the state to deny the accused his right to own property and move about free from restraint or imprisonment. See felony.
Money Lent: Exactly what it sounds like. Money loaned to another that now forms the thing in controversy before the court where the parties are arguing over who has a right to the money lent. Money lent is not a gift.
Moot: Used as either an adjective or a verb, a thing is moot when it is no longer effective, e.g., a dead issue. The famous case of Roe v. Wade dealt with the concept and should be studied, because the issue (being a pregnancy and matters related to the law pertaining to the voluntary termination of pregnancy) was likely to become moot before the courts could deal with it (since the courts could not be expected to reach a decision before the child was born). A moot point, therefore, is one that is beyond the reach of settlement. Either the point has been resolved, or it has disappeared by the action of time or some other change. The old saying, "carrying coals to Newcastle" comes to mind, because Newcastle is a town in England that has no shortage of coal and, therefore, it would be moot to carry coals to that town.
Mortgage: A conditional title in property given to secure promises or other obligations. Mortgages in real property (land) are commonly given to secure lenders by granting conditional title in the land as collateral to protect against default on the part of borrowers. Chattel mortgages may be given to collateralize an obligation by giving a conditional title in personal property. Depending on the terms of the mortgage, if the borrower defaults, the mortgage holder can foreclose to gain complete unconditional title.
Mortgagee: One who receives and holds a mortgage, e.g., a bank or other lender. An obligee.
Mortgagor: One who gives a mortgage, e.g., a borrower. An obligor.
Motion: Here is your power. You can move the court.; To move the court you file a motion. Although you may speak your motions, it is far better practice to write them using the common sense language in separate numbered simple sentences, one subject, one verb, no connectors (like and, but, however, etc.), minimum adjectives and adverbs.; Move the court. Don’t request. For Heaven’s sake, don’t beg. Move the court. Say, "The undersigned moves the court to ... " and fill in the blank with any action you believe justice demands (usually an order resolving some dispute between you and the other party).; If the court denies your motion, move the court to explain in a written order by what authority it denies your motion, i.e., move the court to say why. You are entitled to an explanation in writing from the court, i.e., a reasonable adjudication according to law and not just a curt "no".; If your motion is reasonable and lawful, fair and even-handed, and does not unduly prejudice the other side, the court should grant your motion. Use this word a lot in your motions. Tell the court what it should do. Tell the court why it should do what you move it to do. Cite laws, if you can. State facts that are already part of the public record. Give the judge some solid ground to stand on, and a good judge will grant your reasonable motion in the interests of justice. Tell the court why it should grant your motion. Be as specific and concise as possible.; Move the court to order what you wish. Let each motion clearly seek an order, and follow up each motion with a hearing at which you again ask for the order. Just like a salesman closing a deal, you must ask the court for it’s order ... and if the order does not say what you think it should say then you must move the court to explain itself, i.e., on the public record.; Keep on in this manner until you get what you want.; Motions may be made by either side, and most motions may be made at any time during the court’s jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of the case.; Well-stated and reasonable motions that seek justice are your most powerful tools to get what you want in civil lawsuits. Use motions to show the court what it should do, then demand justice.
Movant: One who makes a motion. The movant usually has the burden to prove his motion should be granted by the court, while the non-moving party has no burden to prove the motion should not be granted ... however, the wise non-moving party will research the law pertaining to the facts asserted in the motion and file a memorandum in opposition to the motion to explain why the movant should not be granted what he asks. The non-moving party should also be prepared to argue his memorandum in opposition at the hearing on the movant’s motion, explaining to the court why the motion should be denied.
Move: Make a motion. Move the court for an order or other action.
Mutatis Mutandis: A phrase indicating that a document or thing may be changed or amended to reflect non-material matters (like a new address or telephone number) without changing the legal effect thereof. Altered, yet fundamentally the same.

Why risk losing?

Optimized for Smartphones, Tablets, and Computers.