D
To request additional definitions,
email lawbook@jurisdictionary.com.
Studied your course for 7 hours then walked into court with confidence and won! The case against me was dismissed. Thank you!
... S. Davidson
... Birmingham, Alabama
... Birmingham, Alabama
Opposing attorney asked me if I had a law degree! Your course is a gem. Thank you!
... M. Miller
... Oklahoma City, OK
... Oklahoma City, OK
I won a criminal case at trial with two lying witnesses against me. I got Jurisdictionary and learned that law works if it's used correctly. The judge read my memorandum and agreed with me. The most wonderful feeling I ever felt was walking out of that courtroom knowing I won without a lawyer!
... Philip J.
... Albany, Georgia
... Albany, Georgia
The other side dismissed when we filed a Motion to Strike Sham Complaint, like you show in your course. We were so happy we were crying with joy. We won! I cannot thank you enough for making it easy to learn.
... Tyler G.
... Olympia, Washington
... Olympia, Washington
Opposing party is calling it quits after a year and a half of hellacious litigation. Thank you!
... Patrick D.
... The Dalles, Oregon
... The Dalles, Oregon
Your course is a must Dr. Graves. Yes, especially for young children to get their footing in the legal world ... and it is fun!
... Rachel T.
... Bend, Oregon
... Bend, Oregon
Won my lawsuit against a major university. Thank you.
... Sandra W.
... Newark, Delaware
... Newark, Delaware
You helped me keep a good kid out of jail. Keep up the good fight! Thank you.
... Michael H.
... South Yarmouth, Massachusetts
... South Yarmouth, Massachusetts
Won a three-year battle against my former attorney who ripped me off. All by using your amazing course.
... Nathan D.
... Los Angeles, California
... Los Angeles, California
A grateful "Thank You" for this excellent course.
... Barbara R.
... Los Angeles, California
... Los Angeles, California
Settled my case! Without your course I would never have gotten to 1st base.
... Larry S.
... Orlando, Florida
... Orlando, Florida
My attorney kept me in the dark but from your course I learned enough to realize he was trying to take my real estate for himself, and I circumvented him thanks to you!
... Anthony A.
... Decatur, Alabama
... Decatur, Alabama
I WON! I used the exact techniques that Dr. Graves taught us and I flattened the attorney! I won 3 cases in a row today! OMG DR. GRAVES IS AMAZING!
... April L.
... Independence, Missouri
... Independence, Missouri
I was able to defend myself with your help.
... Kimberly T.
... Henderson, Nevada
... Henderson, Nevada
I bought your course, and it paid off!
... Ruben P.
... Miami, Florida
... Miami, Florida
I won! My attorney is in trouble! I feel wonderful. I'm very grateful!
... Kelly R.
... Pahrump, Nevada
... Pahrump, Nevada
Cleaned their clock using your methods. Other side had 3 attorneys. Their case came down like a ton of bricks when I proved their elements were not there. Thank you!
... Michael L.
... Springville, New York
... Springville, New York
Won unemployment benefits hearing on my own. Without your Jurisdictionay training, I would not have been effective. The course paid for itself. Your course is a blessing.
... Ben J.
... Los Angeles, California
... Los Angeles, California
Won my Eminent Domain case using your course. Thank you!
... Robert K.
... Jacksonville, Florida
... Jacksonville, Florida
I won favor with the Magistrate! He ruled favorably on every motion I filed! Thank God for your course! And thank God for you!
... Ursula L.
... Cincinnati, Ohio
... Cincinnati, Ohio
Prosecutor dismissed all charges. My son was arrested. We found your course and filed a Motion to Dismiss supported by a 6-page memorandum, Motion for Judicial Notice, and Motion to Produce Discovery. Thank you for what you do for us.
... Michael F.
... Seattle, Washington
... Seattle, Washington
I won $11,000 lawsuit against a bank by using your course. I was amazed how easy it is to understand! It gave me confidence. The bank's case was dismissed with prejudice! Thank you for making a great course. I got back much more than the cost. I got back my dignity! God bless you!
... Reynaldo N.
... Mundelein, Illinois
... Mundelein, Illinois
I stayed on top. Neither the courts nor the bank could knock me out, all because of the education received in your course.
... Holly M.
... Arvada, Colorado
... Arvada, Colorado
Because of you I was able to successfully defend against a credit card case. I was able to file an answer with affirmative defenses and then able to box them in using Request for Admissions. When they didn’t answer, I filed a motion to deem facts admitted with sanctions imposed. The attorney flipped. They dismissed the case!
... A. Douglas
... Los Angeles, California
... Los Angeles, California
Got my second win in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Thanks.
... Sonny S.
... Brooklyn, New York
... Brooklyn, New York
I won in court for the 2nd time using your course. I encourage anyone thinking about hiring a lawyer to get your course first.
... Robert J.
... Bruce Crossing, Michigan
... Bruce Crossing, Michigan
Defeated the Bank of America, controlled my municipality, and avoided criminal prosecution ... all by using the simple methods you teach!
... Stephen M.
... Eureka, Montana
... Eureka, Montana
I have the defendants right where they belong. I am SO indebted to you!
... Charles H.
... Augusta, Georgia
... Augusta, Georgia
I won! I used your course to file a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Cause of Action and a Motion for More Definite Statement. The bogus case against me was dismissed.
... Clark R.
... Waltham, Massachusetts
... Waltham, Massachusetts
Another victory! They backed off as soon as they received my demands! You are a prayer answered from the Lord!
... Sam T.
... Dallas, Texas
... Dallas, Texas
Used your method to force the other side to produce a contract they claimed I breached. When they could not, I filed a motion to dismiss. They settled. Thanks for your course! I was amazed how sound and easy to understand your lessons are.
... Joseph R.
... Miami, Florida
... Miami, Florida
We won our 1st battle in court thanks to your program. Thank you kindly, Dr. Graves.
... L. Moreno
... Palo Alto, California
... Palo Alto, California
Because of your course, my story includes dozens of wins, a successful appeal, and winning custody of my son. Thank you!
... Lee M.
... Chattanooga, Tennessee
... Chattanooga, Tennessee
Defeated several collection agencies and their lawyers. Your course is excellent!
... Robert S.
... Kanab, Utah
... Kanab, Utah
Won every case for 4 years using your program. Keep up the amazing work!
... John M.
... Phenix City, Alabama
... Phenix City, Alabama
Thanks. Your course is in a class by itself and a remarkable tutor.
... Sam S.
... Coronado, California
... Coronado, California
I went to court 6 times against 6 different creditors & won every case because I LEARNED HOW TO FIGHT BACK USING YOUR JURISDICTIONARY!
... Mark C.
... Cheyenne, Wyoming
... Cheyenne, Wyoming
I won my motion at a hearing this morning. Other people waiting for their case to be called were surprised that I won, because my English is not so good. You are right. Anybody can do this!
... Julius R.
... Knoxville, Tennessee
... Knoxville, Tennessee
Forced my ex-partner to settle for $50,000. Sued him using your excellent teachings! Thanks for your excellent course.
... Kevin C.
... North Conway, New Hampshire
... North Conway, New Hampshire
It's not a law course. It's a life course! Armed with Jurisdictionary I was able to defeat one of the biggest junk debt companies and their team of 6 lawyers!
... Kevin Z.
... Norman, Oklahoma
... Norman, Oklahoma
My criminal case was dismissed! I'm home with my family, thankful for your course.
... Bethany T.
... Great Barrington, Massachussets
... Great Barrington, Massachussets
I WON using your course! My attorney is in trouble! She will not be doing this to anyone else. I praise not only God but you, the ethical attorney God led me to. I'm very grateful!
... Kathryn R.
... Pahrump, Nevada
... Pahrump, Nevada
Without your course I would have been another casualty of the system.
... Basile D.
... Wilson, Wyoming
... Wilson, Wyoming
A guide to the rules attorneys follow in civil lawsuits.
... The Charlotte Observer
... Charlotte, North Carolina
... Charlotte, North Carolina
Defeated my neighbor's case against me. Used what you teach to get the case dismissed with prejudice. Thank you for your wonderful course.
... Joe P.
... Arlington, Washington
... Arlington, Washington
I used your course successfully. Thank you!
... Alan P.
... Belfast, Maine
... Belfast, Maine
Won a three-year battle against my former attorney who ripped me off after taking my retainer payment. Thank you!
... Nathan D.
... Los Angeles, California
... Los Angeles, California
Forced my bank to release an illegal hold on my account. Bank's lawyer said I couldn't do it, but I got my money back thanks to you!
... Tim T.
... Abingdon, Virginia
... Abingdon, Virginia
I survived a federal appeal in the 9th Circuit by using what you teach. Thank you!
... Ivette R.
... Richmond, California
... Richmond, California
Opposing party dismissed their case against me. Thank you for the knowledge and insight you provided through your course.
... Gerald C.
... Tucker, Georgia
... Tucker, Georgia
I've learned so much that I decided to run for the U.S. Senate seat here. Your course gives me confidence I can be a lawmaker who knows how law is supposed to work.
... Rob T.
... Cumberland, Wisconsin
... Cumberland, Wisconsin
Took on the City of Omaha and won using your course. I was featured on a popular radio show to give proof "one man can defeat City Hall". Thank you!
... John M.
... Omaha, Nebraska
... Omaha, Nebraska
Your course works! Best investment ever. Invested in my own Legal Education. Worked for me! Thanks.
... Don H.
... Atlanta, Georgia
... Atlanta, Georgia
Jurisdictionary WORKS! Won against a powerful attorney. Even the other attorneys in the gallery were talking about it.
... Kathy A.
... Huntersville, North Carolina
... Huntersville, North Carolina
Successfully used your course in divorce/family court. I wish to thank you!
... Rita F.
... Chicago, Illinois
... Chicago, Illinois
One of my defendants wanted to settle immediately. I am so glad I read your teaching on the complaint before I filed it.
... Larry S.
... Des Moines, Iowa
... Des Moines, Iowa
Wish I had a picture of the opposing attorney's face when I objected to his attempt to get an affidavit admitted! Thanks!
... B.J.H.
... Pasadena, Maryland
... Pasadena, Maryland
I got them to dismiss their case today by applying what I learned in Jurisdictionary. They dismissed knowing they didn't have a leg to stand on because my answer, affirmative defenses and counter claims backed them into a corner. Thank you!
... Perry B.
... Batesville, IN
... Batesville, IN
We were able to get the law in front of the judges and keep them honest thanks to you.
... Susan R.
... West Jordan, Utah
... West Jordan, Utah
I finally won my lawsuit in the New York Supreme Court of Appeals. It took 8 years and representing myself in 5 different courts, but I won at last. Thank you and God bless You.
... Susan Z.
... Harpersfield, New York
... Harpersfield, New York
I want to thank everyone involved in creating this amazing website. I not only saved thousands of dollars in attorney fees, my case was dismissed. I was charged with a crime which I did not commit. With your course I was able to win my case!
... Roy G.
... Kissimmee, Florida
... Kissimmee, Florida
Won 4 motions in court yesterday. Wish I had your tutorials a year ago!
... Linda S.
... Roswell, Georgia
... Roswell, Georgia
HOA dropped their case! I can now start my life over after 10 years of unfounded harassment by greedy people! My only regret is not getting your course sooner.
... Becca C.
... Tampa, Florida
... Tampa, Florida
Controlled my grandfather’s useless attorneys. They told me I was wrong. I won by stopping the judge with precedent and a court reporter. Your course made all the difference.
... Jeffrey M.
... Chicago, Illinois
... Chicago, Illinois
I beat 3 criminal cases, thanks to your course!
... Alex A.
... Stockton, California
... Stockton, California
I used your teachings and got custody of my children. Thank you!
... D. Herman
... Los Gatos, California
... Los Gatos, California
I have learned more in the last few days than I could have in years on my budget.
... David P.
... Alta Loma, California
... Alta Loma, California
I won $216,000 using your course! Sued my employer for violating my copyright. Lawyers turned me down, afraid to sue giant corporation. Best investment ever!
... Patrick D.
... Olympia, Washington
... Olympia, Washington
Saved $160,000 thanks to your course!
... James D.
... Reno, Nevada
... Reno, Nevada
The judge was amazed when I outmaneuvered my opponent's team of high-priced lawyers. Lead attorney was former Assistant State Attorney General. I won because of you and your course. Thank you!
... Ronald P.
... Crawfordsville, Indiana
... Crawfordsville, Indiana
I won $20,000! I smoked them on depositions. I caught one lawyer submitting false evidence and got him fired. They started with 4 lawyers then added 3 more, but I won the case against them all!
... Robert C.
... Steubenville, Ohio
... Steubenville, Ohio
I used what you teach to stop foreclosure. No mortgage. No foreclosure. No note. No foreclosure. Thank you!
... Ken M.
... Tampa, Florida
... Tampa, Florida
Beat 3 collection agencies. Ecstatic about my victories. Prior to your fine program, I was one of the ignorant herd these people prey upon. Your user-friendly course is the best $249 I've ever spent. My wife overheard plaintiff's attorney say, "Don't mess with that guy!" Wow!
... Donald B.
... St. Louis, Missouri
... St. Louis, Missouri
I have filed 6 complaints against debt collectors with 22 defendants for violations of consumer laws using what you teach and never lost a case. Thank you.
... Paul J.
... Staughton, Massachussets
... Staughton, Massachussets
I ordered your course May 31st. On June 28th the lawsuit against me was "Dismissed with Prejudice." Many thanks as I was clueless until I reviewed your videos and excellent classes.
... Tracy B.
... Beltsville, Maryland
... Beltsville, Maryland
I won! I defeated a felony charge and 10 misdemeanor charges. I fired the public defender and fought the case with your course. Everything was dismissed!
... Natalie W.
... Utica, New York
... Utica, New York
Wow! Amazing! This course is a dream of mine that came true. I'll never forget you and this course. I'll advertise for you so others can learn how to win in court.
... Charles S.
... Houston, Texas
... Houston, Texas
Never ever been in court. Bought your course. Got the settlement I wanted.
... Derek S.
... Madison, Wisconsin
... Madison, Wisconsin
Defeated a West Point lawyer and my Ex (retired Army J.A.G. attorney) without a lawyer, saving myself $160,000 by using your course to point out their multiple errors. I tell everyone!
... James D.
... Reno, Nevada
... Reno, Nevada
County officials decided to settle when I used your course to take them to the 9th Circuit Appellate Court here in California. You're the best.
... Pat H.
... Sacramento, California
... Sacramento, California
After taking your course I realized that there was no evidence to convict me in a criminal case. I got my case back from my public defender who told me I was doomed. Thank you, Jurisdictionary! I'm a free woman thanks to your course.
... Jessica W.
... Wallingford, Connecticutt
... Wallingford, Connecticutt
I won my case in the Alaska Supreme Court against my Borough government in support of citizens' right to petition government through the initiative and referendum process. Your course helped me understand the concepts necessary to prevail.
... James P.
... Nikiski, Alaska
... Nikiski, Alaska
I was able to secure a great deal of money with what I learned in your course. I am extremely grateful to a lawyer who was unable to help me but suggested I look up "How to win in court". I could not have won without completing your course.
... Tervor, S.
... Joondanna, Washington
... Joondanna, Washington
Resolved my legal battles with your outstanding law course. It feels really good to have stood my ground aggressively and, as you say, chopping them off at the knees so they can't get back up!
... Gary K.
... Jacksonville, Florida
... Jacksonville, Florida
Won my appeal in the 2nd District Court in Florida because of your excellent course.
... Roger P.
... Palm Harbor, Florida
... Palm Harbor, Florida
I felt like I was going into a gun fight without a gun. You gave me the gun and the bullets. Now it is an even fight. Your course is gold for me.
... Alfred S.
... Buffalo, New York
... Buffalo, New York
Fired my attorney 2 years ago and began using your course. Cornered the plaintiff and his "experienced attorney" with my demands for discovery and motions. They did not even show up for trial after chasing me 3 years to extort money in a false claim. Case closed.
... Tony M.
... Bend, Oregon
... Bend, Oregon
Your course has given me a lifeline. Thank you.
... Joan P.
... Gloucestershire, England
... Gloucestershire, England
It all fell into place once I purchased your amazing self-help course! The case law I took to my attorneys was better than the "unpublished" document they offered as their "case law". They told me I should come to work for them!
... Kelly J.
... Guymon, Oklahoma
... Guymon, Oklahoma
I got my child back!
... Tina T.
... El Paso, Texas
... El Paso, Texas
Defeated a 35-year veteran lawyer I've been fighting the last 3 years. Most of this victory is credited to your course. I can't thank you enough.
... Bill J.
... Columbus, Ohio
... Columbus, Ohio
Everything You Need
Click Below for Previews
- Damage
- In order to prevail in any lawsuit brought in the courts of our American system, the party bringing the action must prove he suffered some loss or damage in addition to proving that the defendant being sued is liable, i.e., that the defendant is responsible for the legal cause of the plaintiff’s damage. Both liability and damages must be pleaded and then proved in every case by meeting the burden of proof.
- De Novo
- A Latin term applied typically to trials or hearings that begin from the start, i.e., re-presenting testimony and other evidence. A trial de novo is one that starts from the beginning, presenting all the evidence. An appellate review de novo is one wherein the appellate court agrees to hear evidence that was presented in the trial court (not normally done), perhaps because there was such an abuse of power or abuse of discretion by the trial judge that justice requires the appeals court to hear the entire story before rendering its opinion, since the truth was not permitted to come forth in the lower court.
- Decedent
- Person who has died, i.e., one who is deceased.
- Decision
- Any ruling by the court. It could be a final judgment or merely a ruling sustaining a via voce (spoken) motion at a hearing or trial.
- Decriminalize
- This is not so much a legal term as it is a term used by the media and, therefore, lacking legal specificity. The term is best understood in contrast to legalize (q.v.), a word having a similar but not exactly the same meaning. To decriminalize is to remove the criminal aspect from a previously unlawful behavior (e.g., the repeal of prohibition that allowed people to possess and enjoy alcoholic beverages early in the Twentieth Century) while retaining criminal penalties for related behavior outside legal limits established by the legislation that "decriminalized" the behavior. For example, possession of alcoholic beverages was decriminalized by repeal of prohibition. People (other than minors) are now free from criminal prosecution for possessing liquor, wine, or beer. At the same time, it remains a crime to manufacture alcoholic beverages in quantities greater than the maximum allowable limit set by the decriminalizing statutes. In most jurisdictions one may make home-brew beers or ales, ferment and bottle wine, but not operate a distillery to manufacture whiskey and sell it to his neighbors. See legalize.
- Defamation
- An actionable injury suffered by communication of lies in either speech or in print. See libel and slander.
- Defendant
- The defendant is that unlucky fellow who has been served with a summons and complaint, the person who must file some sort of defense or lose by default. How your case is handled from the very start is critical to success for, unlike the plaintiff who may have been planning his lawsuit for many months or even years, the defendant usually has a short time in which to respond to the complaint - in many jurisdictions the time allowed is only 20 days. If the defendant is unable to get the complaint dismissed or stricken, he may be required to file an answer stating whether he admits the allegations of the complaint or not. There may be more than one defendant. Each defendant is a party.
- Defense
- It’s often been said the best defense is a good offense, and nowhere is this more true than in a civil lawsuit. The plaintiff begins on the offense when he files his complaint. The defendant must then "defend" against the plaintiff’s action, and this he does best by turning the tables against the plaintiff, if he can. For example, as soon as the plaintiff files and serves his case, a wise defendant will attempt to have the complaint stricken or dismissed. He will seek to show the complaint is false or that it fails to state a cause of action worthy of the court’s attention and valuable time. All these actions constitute a defense that is on the offensive, i.e., actively opposing the plaintiff’s case rather than merely attempting to make excuses or otherwise to avoid its effect. Good civil defense attorneys know the best way to defend against a lawsuit is to destroy it if possible. Force the plaintiff to prove his facts. Make the plaintiff state the law he relies upon. Don’t just throw up road-blocks, fight back with every tool the law provides for getting at the truth! Take control of the case and stay in control. The smart defendant takes over the "driver’s seat" early in the case and stays there until the plaintiff gives up or is ruled against by the court’s final judgment. Put your legal rights to work! Bite back!
- Demurrer
- The demurrer motion is often misused as a motion to dismiss a claim, however technically it admits the claim while alleging the claim is irrelevant, immaterial, without basis. If you encounter this, and the demurrer is technically improper, a motion to strike the demurrer is in order
- On the other hand, if the claim does fail to allege facts or law relevant to the issues before the court, or fails to state sufficient facts to support a valid cause of action, or otherwise is improper in some regard, the proper thing is to address the demurrer by filing an amended claim correcting the problem.
- Do not to ignore it, for it will not go away of its own accord.
- Depose
- Strictly speaking, the word means to "make come down" or to "remove from another place".
- The term is sometimes used to describe the process by which kings and other rulers are removed from power and, in this sense, to depose a person in the scope of a civil lawsuit is to remove that person from the place of comfort and repose he previously occupied, to make him liable to the court’ penalties for perjury by prescribing the oath, and by asking him questions (whether or not he might care to answer willingly) pertaining to pretty much any matter you wish to inquire into, so long as the questions are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
- Questions may be asked of deponents that could not be asked of a witness at trial, because the rules are looser with regard to taking depositions. The scope of examination at a deposition may inquire into facts that would be beyond the scope of admissible evidence at trial (i.e., a deposition may inquire into facts that could not be presented at trial) so long as the questions are reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of evidence that would be admissible at trial.
- The deposition is a powerful tool for getting at the truth.
- It can also be misused. It is improper to depose another merely for the purpose of harassing him or her; such actions before civil courts on this planet generally make the bad actor liable to court penalties called sanctions.
- The act of deposing is carried out at a deposition, where an officer of the state, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments by law, is employed to record every word that is said (i.e., verbatim) and to transcribe same into printed pages called deposition transcripts to which the officer (a notary or official court reporter) affixes his or her sworn affidavit that the words printed in the transcript are a true and accurate recording of all that was actually said.
- Depositions may be used in lieu of live testimony at trial in certain circumstances, e.g., when the deponent resides at great distance from the court, when the deponent dies before trial, and when the deponent later called as a witness at trial contradicts the testimony given at the earlier deposition.
- Since the court may sustain your opponent’s objections if you attempt to depose a person more than once, it is wise to know as much as possible about your case and your opponent’s position before taking depositions. Some lawyers believe the taking of depositions is all that’ needed before proceeding to trial. In most cases, written discovery should be used to get a clear idea of the facts of the case before taking depositions.
- If a proposed deponent is leaving the court’s jurisdiction or threatened with grave illness, prudence will depose such person as soon as practicable. In some cases the court may grant a party leave to depose such persons even before the case is filed. The court’s order granting permission, of course, is obtained by making a timely motion.
- Deposition
- The legal proceedings at which a party acts to depose another party or third person by asking questions of such party or person under penalties of perjury. Some sloppy thinking lawyers use the term to describe the printed material that re-states all the questions and answers, however the proper term for the written transcription prepared by the court reporter or notary is deposition transcript. The deposition is a court proceeding at which questions are asked and answered. The transcript is a sworn printed statement of everything that was said at the deposition; it is not the deposition. See depose.
- Direct Evidence
- Evidence based on direct facts as opposed to circumstantial evidence based on inferences surmised from direct facts (or, God save us, from other inferences surmised from yet other inferences or one person’s intuition based on the opinion of yet another person). Direct evidence is evidence that is believed by reasonable people without having to jump to any conclusions. Facts that cannot be disputed by reasonable persons. Direct evidence does not require any stretch of imagination. Circumstantial evidence is not direct evidence.
- Direct Fact
- Facts that are not disputed by reasonable persons. A direct fact may be best explained by saying what in-direct facts are, i.e., facts inferred or surmised from other facts. A direct fact requires no inference. A direct fact is not surmised. A direct fact is a fact that any reasonable person would believe to be true without conjecture, without imagination, without relying on a hunch in any way. Pure speculation founded solely on conjecture, hypothesis, or inference should not be given the same weight for determining the outcome of a case as facts that are clearly evident. Direct facts are clearly evident. Direct facts are, therefore, good evidence if they are relevant to the issues in your case. Circumstantial evidence is not direct evidence.
- Direct Question
- See Cross-Examination.
- Discovery
- The process of finding facts that may lead to admissible evidence to be placed in the court file or presented at hearings or trial. The five primary discovery methods include: requests for admissions, requests for production, interrogatories, depositions, and subpoena power.
- Discretion
- In every jurisdiction judges are given a certain latitude within which they are permitted to exercise their own "judgment", i.e., according to their private view of what is right or reasonable based on the law and facts presented on the court’s record. This is called judicial discretion. Judges must, however, abide by the reasonableness test. See also abuse of discretion.
- Dismissal
- When a pleading fails to comply with the law or lacks sufficient factual grounds to go forward, the court may enter an order dismissing the pleading. If the dismissal is with prejudice, the case is over, and the plaintiff cannot bring his case again on the same argument of law and fact. If the dismissal is without prejudice, the plaintiff may re-file his or her pleading after amending it to fix the problem(s) that resulted in the dismissal.
- Dispositive
- Tending to dispose of an issue. A dispositive fact is one which, if proved, will decide the case. See relevant, material, pertinent.
- Doctrine
- In the field of law, a doctrine is a principle generally followed or a set of rules intended to accomplish a particular aspect of justice.
- Donee
- One who receives a gift. The donee has no obligation to return the gift. It is his own as soon as he receives possession (but not until, since a gift is not complete until the donor has released it).
- Donor
- One who gives a gift.
- Duces Tecum
- When this Latin term appears in legal papers it means, simply, "Bring it with you." A subpoena duces tecum, for example, requires not only attendance of the witness at a hearing, trial, or deposition as set forth in the body of the subpoena but also that the witness bring along whatever documents or things that may be listed in the subpoena or attached papers appended to the subpoena. Failure to comply may expose the witness to contempt penalties.
- Due Diligence
- Here is a term of art seldom understood but frequently seen in the papers of civil lawsuits. In its plain meaning due diligence is the diligence due to a particular matter (hence the term). Due diligence is the reasonable attention a reasonable man would pay to the matter under the circumstances. Due diligence is a duty imputed to all of us to observe the protocols of civil obedience to the extent doing so does not deprive us unjustly. For example, if Green hires White to supervise Black, and White takes naps in the afternoon while Black leans on the broom handle, White is said to have failed to exercise due diligence. If a guardian undertakes the care of his ward then permits the ward to die of malnutrition at the nursing home, there has been a lack of due diligence. Ultimately, in a civil lawsuit, the determination of whether or not a party exercised due diligence or not is one for the trier of fact (i.e., the jury if a jury is trying the facts, or the judge if there is no jury). The test, again, is the diligence a reasonable man would deem to be due under the circumstances.
- Due Process
- Due process is the right of individuals and the obligation of the government’s courts to see that any action by one party is made known to the other party in a timely and reasonable manner so the other party may prepare for and defend against the action brought by his adversary. In short, due process is the right to receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before the court enters any order or takes any action that might restrict your rights or grant another party any right against you. Due process is also the right to be left alone, free from unreasonable search and seizure, as guaranteed to Americans under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. A more complete explanation of due process is given in the tutorials.
- Durable Power of Attorney
- See Power of Attorney.
- Duty
- Duty is the obligation one owes to another that gives courts the right to order enforcement of that obligation. Duties give rise to causes of action, because every cause of action arises from the breach of a duty. In our society, everyone owes a duty not to cause injury to others ... either with intent or negligence. If one breaches his duty to another, he may be liable in either a civil court or, if the duty is serious enough, in criminal court. Not all duties, however, give rise to a cause of action. For example, if Billy promises Sue that they will marry on June 4th and gets cold feet at the last moment, our courts will not enforce the obligation he took upon himself by making that promise, for all such promises are "contracts in contemplation of marriage" and no longer enforceable under the laws of any state in the nation. If Billy promised Sue he’d take her to the movies if she baked him a cake, and she bakes the cake but he backs out of taking her to the movies, she would have a cause of action to at least recover the price of her ticket (though, of course, it would cost more to bring her lawsuit than the ticket would be worth). The point is that duty gives rise to obligation, and enforcement of obligation is what courts are all about.