One side puts out affidavits V files detailed objections (i.e. affiant has no knowledge, lacks credibility, false, misleading...) to the affidavits. The state court states that these "have not been motioned up" and moves on to summary judgment.
Setting aside for a moment that no summary judgement cannot be if any material fact is in dispute.
Since when does the court need a motion to consider affidavit or a objection to one? Also perhaps he is encouraging a motion to rule on the affidavit inadmissible?
Don't know where he is coming from - am Leary as the status quo is: Pro-se means you may not even get a seat in the back of the bus.

"Since when does the court need a motion to consider affidavit or a objection to one"

they dont you put them on record and thats that..

the rest of the post i dont understand