Next Page

1

Previous Page

Topic: Committing a felony against a disabled person.

Created on: 11/19/22 07:37 PM

Replies: 1

JOHNNY10


Joined: 11/13/22

Posts: 1

Committing a felony against a disabled person.
11/19/22 7:37 PM

Are there any further laws that protect Disabled People. They trespassed my property, threatened Me, To cut my power with no Lawful Authority, a felony. I also have Stalking, phone threats and 2 more email threats. All against a disabled person. I am new to program. Thank you for any (unreliability to you) guidance Or direction to research.
* Last updated by: JOHNNY10 on 11/19/2022 @ 7:44 PM *

Link | Top | Bottom

AARON13


Joined: 06/30/21

Posts: 2

RE: Committing a felony against a disabled person.
11/26/22 3:32 PM

Johnny10,
Have you taken a look at the section regarding Natural law in the reference section? I would recommend using natural law to argue the fact that they used game theory (social sciences) to disregard your natural rights. Your natural rights aren't abstract and they certainly aren't administrative in nature. You can also point out the fact that they used bias and prejudice against you (lack of impartiality; truth). My understanding is that if a government worker is not impartial with you then it disqualifies them from making decisions and they lose legal immunity to torts. I personally have dealt with benefits for disabled persons and have brought up this important point up. There are numerous games that are included with game theory such as the prisoner's dilemma. You can also bring up in writing the numerous logical fallacies (deceit and trickery) were used against you. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that involve fraud. You will also need to know the difference between an inductive and deductive argument. Natural law involves a deductive argument and you will also need to look into Aristotle and his Organon An inductive argument which is what is used within positive law doesn't involve truth and justice but what is a strong or weak argument. Two different conclusions in arguments. You should learn the art of the argument as well. You could ask where is the direct evidence that they can violate your natural rights that aren't administrative. Nothing is concrete and truth in positive law. There is a relationship between philosophy and law.

Link | Top | Bottom

Next Page

1

Previous Page

New Post

Please login to post a response.