The judge denied all (7) plaintiff motions without reading them, regardless of the motion type, regardless of the issues in the motions and without any respect to law!

All motions were written and filed with the court in full compliance with law. The judge and the opposing party never objected to the service of notice of hearing.

The judge did not allow plaintiff to speak during hearing.

On one of the hearings, after constantly interrupting plaintiff, the judge said that would not allow plaintiff to use law in the court.

The court permitted, over plaintiff's objections, unsigned defendant's papers, filed with the court, hearsay, forgery of signatures and perjury.

The court keeps making speculations and conditional statements in its rulings. For example, the court stated that "Answer was signed. Even if there was omission in the signature" plaintiff's motion to strike unsigned pleadings per California CCP 128.7(a) is denied.

Plaintiff filed peremptory challenge to disqualify the judge (Cal CCP 170.6). Under law, the court must disqualify the judge immediately, hence the name "peremptory". The same judge denied plaintiff's peremptory challenge.

I am in California, Contra Costa County.

Please help!

PS. Complaint requested $6000 in civil fines. The court reporter in California charges $500 only to show up at hearing. It is huge financial burden for plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff did not hire the reporter.
* Last updated by: DMITRIY1 on 1/31/2021 @ 6:21 PM *