I Want to put an idea out here and see what every one else has to say.I find that whenever I try to give the benefit of the doubt be fair not attack unless it is fair by the rules I leave myself open for attack.I don't really want to feel like I have to convince the judge of my good intentions as a pro se litigant.I have had judges ask by what authority I am relying on.As if I where ready to talk about the fringe on the flag or some other foolish defense.I have always relied on only the rules of the court, rules of procedure rules of appeal.In other words the correct rules and yet I have to play there game.I believe in the rule of law.The problem is they think it applies only to me.I would like to hear how other have dealt with this problem in a good way as my response is usually way to close to the truth.By the inalienable rights granted me by God or if you don't believe in God then by nature. The united states constitution my state constitution and the rules created by my state supreme court.Never seems to be enough .What do You all think?Anyway I would really like to hear from You all as to what your opinions are.
Hope to hear from you.
Tom