someone else more qualified should answer.
IMO, if you plan to amend the complaint, the notify the parties in a motion to amend the pleading. Always, notify the parties in a motion so that there are not surprises.
You may need to respond to the motion to dismiss, check with the rules in your court and jurisdiction.
Be advised that the State and officials will file a defense for immunity because this status must be decided before proceeding further. It is a good idea to prepare your response to immunity either for 11th amendment or otherwise.
Please review the statues on qualified and absolute immunity. you should know the difference before filing a response the motion to dismiss.
In regards to your amended complaint, please use simply language because you are not an attorney. One subject, one verb and include all the elements. every cause of action has its elements. review the section of this jurisdiction and follow the guidelines.
This is just my opinion.
good luck
Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Immunity
The judicial defendants argue that they are entitled to judicial immunity from suit. It is well-established that judges enjoy "absolute immunity from suits for money damages for their judicial actions." Bliven v. Hunt, 579 F.3d 204, 209 (2d Cir. 2009). Moreover, § 1983 provides that "in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable." 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see also Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 761 (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam).
"First, a judge is not immune from liability for non-judicial actions, i.e., actions not taken in the judge's judicial capacity. Second, a judge is not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction." Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S. Ct. 286, 288 (1991).
