Next Page

1

Previous Page

Topic: Construction of Pleading Paper/Complaint

Created on: 01/02/17 02:45 PM

Replies: 4

RAS1


Joined: 11/20/16

Posts: 5

Construction of Pleading Paper/Complaint
01/02/17 2:45 PM

When a complaint is created, is it necessary to add an introduction section into the pleading?

Link | Top | Bottom

CHRIS4


Joined: 11/08/13

Posts: 58

RE: Construction of Pleading Paper/Complaint
01/03/17 10:30 PM

When you write a complaint, use simple and complete sentences and only write was is needed. Dr. Graves has a section on writing format (I can't remember the exact location).

Link | Top | Bottom

GREG9


Joined: 06/21/17

Posts: 1

filing forms with the Clerk of Court in Illinois
06/22/17 12:37 AM

What is the process to file forms with the Clerk of Court in Illinois

Link | Top | Bottom

JURISDICTIONARY


Joined: 11/23/13

Posts: 142

RE: Construction of Pleading Paper/Complaint
06/22/17 10:28 AM

If there is any question, ask the clerk. Typically, one files the forms and, for security sake I often ask them to make me a copy and time-stamp it for me so I have proof each form was, in fact, filed. Hope this helps. Perhaps you're making more of it than there is. The clerk of court MUST take your forms IF AND ONLY IF the forms you are filing are in proper order and pertain to an open case or are initiating a case. One cannot just go to court and start filing forms unless and until there is a case and case number that identifies the case.
Please study my course completely. It is worth every moment you spend on it, Chris4.

Link | Top | Bottom

JOSEPH40


Joined: 04/07/18

Posts: 4

RE: Construction of Pleading Paper/Complaint
04/17/18 8:37 PM

A question about facts that support elements of causes of action- I am in Federal Court now, having discovered the Jurisdictionary course regretfully late in the game, but not too late.
I am writing an amended complaint. In the present complaint, I had listed as many realistic facts as I could that supported the claims. My thought was that if one fact was turned out unproven, then another fact could suffice for the same purpose. This seems to make sense to me, but it also seems to go against the teaching in the course which instruct to state only the bare-boned that gets the claim heard.
Other ways of asking about it- once the case passes the stage of pleadings, is it true that no new 'facts' can be introduced? Will the Trial ONLY be heard on the facts that are introduced in the final form of the complaint?
* Last updated by: JOSEPH40 on 4/18/2018 @ 12:15 AM *

Link | Top | Bottom

Next Page

1

Previous Page

New Post

Please login to post a response.