What's the use of any of this if the Supreme Court is corrupt?
The State of Texas gets denied and can't even be heard when they have a complaint against, what appear to them to be, un-Constitutional actions against citizens? I understand that those citizens were subject to other states but to deny the State of Texas the right to even be heard for standing up for the United States Constitution, to me, makes no sense. I want to finsish this course, but seeing how easy it is for the highest court in the land to just do whatever they please removes any sense of confidence I may have had in the judicial system of this country.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.