who can you send admissions to the da and the cops

Wow, 3 years later and nobody ever answered this poor vance1... well, I have the same question.

I learned about discovery here in this class, and while the examples given were about contract law, I would imagine pretty much any case to be the same... my situation is that I am trying to defend myself in traffic court against a really corrupt cop who lied and invented all kinds of nonsense and arrested me unlawfully, etc etc.

I filed requests for admission (to the prosecuting attorney and to the cop and to the cop's superior officer) but at the pre-trial hearing, 40 days after my filing requests for admission and I made a motion to deem requests admitted for failure to respond, as I learned in this course, the judge laughed at me and said there is no such thing as admissions for a criminal case.

How can an inapplicable administrative transportation-related paperwork issue could possibly morph into an actual crime? That part is still foggy to me.

But in any case, yes, I'll bump this question, in hopes that someone can answer both vance1 and me.

Correct. The Rules of CIVIL procedure provide for admissions. The Rules of CRIMINAL procedure are different, as explained in the course. Much of what you learn about evidence, objections, motions, and such like DO apply in both types of cases, but CRIMINAL procedure has its own rules.

Good luck. Keep studying Dr. Graves' course.

This race is not for the swift. Endurance!

Hi, Im in Ireland, i had a summons to court for a unpaid speeding fine from a speed van camera, This is the first attempt at court, Ive read alot here but im still a bit unsure where to start, Do i send in a request to the court for information first, I am at the very beginning of my journey

Hi Stephen69, I'm on Terra Australis (known by most by a corporate name "AUSTRALIA").

Firstly, do not be tricked by the fine paperwork into applying to fight the allegation in court. If they take you to court then the burden of proof is on them, as claimant, to prove you did what they claim you did. If you apply to the court then you become the one who has to prove that you didn't do what they said you did.

Even before them taking you to court you have right to use the 'lawful due process' letters option to direct them to provide 'further and better particulars' in order for them to show you suitable proof that they have grounds to even bring that claim against you.

Fines, council rates, and many many other things claimed by corporations claiming to be legitimate can be stopped dead in their tracks through the above explained process.

It may take a little time to learn how to create your own 'lawful due process' 'Notice in law' documents, but if they take it to court in the meantime you use what you are learning in the jurisprudence course, as the info is brilliant.

At the end of the day they are attempting a roadside robbery against you, so learn to stand up for yourself against these foreign corporate land pirates, by showing them the door in every way you can.

Then teach others how to do it too.

Blessing to you my brother in mankind.
* Last updated by: JASON72 on 10/28/2023 @ 11:22 PM *