It seems to me that since the Judicial branch of our Government, and especially referencing the decisions in cases in Federal Court, are where 'the Buck Stops', than that is where government reform should be concentrated:
No law or rule or regulation survives unless the Courts enforce it.
Further, the State Courts, and Laws, eventually bend to the Findings of the Federal Courts. The CONSTITUTION which underpins our government and rights and way of life depends on this process.
But there is a weakness in the present structure. Keeping this short, the fact that the United States Supreme Court is overwhelmed with cases leaves a big gap in the guidance needed to keep the country working within the precepts of the CONSTITUTION. That Honored Tribunal hears about 1% of the cases that hit the Bench each year, and the other Constitution questions go unanswered. This built in uncertainty reverberates all the way down to individual cases in every court and effects even how attorneys behave and enrich themselves.
Most efforts to effect the problem involve placing properly minded Judges in vacated Federal Court offices, mostly at the District court level. There are some 30,000 of them with life long positions, and little Supreme Court guidances on new matters. Each US President attempts to fill vacancies with like-minded persons. Its patch-work, and very susceptible to allowing deviation from proper civil rights to become entrenched over time (Stare-decisis) uncorrected by Supreme Court.
Alternatively, Article III of the CONSTITUTION describes that Congress can establish courts below the Supreme Court as needed.
I propose that a solution to the issue can be having Congress establish a fourth layer of Courts between the Supreme Court and the Circuit Courts. The duty would be to take up the slack for the Supreme Court and hear cases that would otherwise be neglected. The same courts might also be empowered to selectively review decisions of lower courts.
This would trickle down to make all litigation more predictable.

What I find to be totally against what the Constitution has as separation of powers ;Executive, Legislation and Judicial is being violated by judges being allowed to change the rules of the court. For example in Arizona the Chief Justice re-writes the Rules of the probate immediately after a justice of the Peace violates many of the probate court rules and the code of judiciary conduct and CANONS that prohibited a judge (at the time the judge knowingly used undue influence by wearing his judges robe numerous times ....4 months before my dad died and the judge had his own attorneys draft a new will and restated in its entirety an 89 page trust that names the judge as successor Trustee- this was done after Judge was given copy of Will that revoked all trusts and devised and bequeathed all assets to be split 50 50 between decedent's daughters) The judge came in his robe and demanded my father sign blank pages to take back to courtroom. This judge took one million in first month after my dad died ..Fiduciaries have taken 5 million and it has been six years and estate still not closed.

more government wont help .. adding a forth layer when they intentionally created what you described wont make them do whats right,
the solution is a system that abides by capitalistic rules ..it supply's what its paid to do or it losses' business to someone who dose the job better

We need not more government,but a smaller government that represents the people . If our original constitution was actually followed with original intent, we would have over 10,000 House of Representatives (one for every 30,000 population) which would place your congressman into your own neighborhood, someone you could personally call with concerns. Right now, we have one congressman for every 800,000 or so, which means if you write to your congressman, you get a form letter in response. The 30,000 rule was actually George Washington's idea during the convention,and he gave the first presidential veto when Congress tried to by-pass this provision. Also, jury nullification also was the original intent as it was commonly understood and practiced during those times, which once again puts power back into the hands of the people. It does no good to increase the number of Justices when they are no longer representative of the people and are merely a reflection of a corrupt, out-of-touch congress. Also, senators are suppose to be chosen by the state legislatures to force senators to be responsive to their respective state needs. Most general public voters have no clue what their senators have been up to.