As the accused party, is it better to file all of the relevant motions together as one document, saving money on various paperwork-related costs, or to file them all separately, so that perhaps one of them would be accepted even if several get denied?

Also, is it OK to file them all on the same day, without waiting for the first one to be granted/denied before filing the second, etc.?

Bump.

Your question is answered in the course, B3. Please study ALL of the course before asking questions in the forum. Thanks.

"I object" to this non-answer...

:)

...on the grounds that it is not helpful in the least AND that it appears to disdain, belittle and disrespect me, the fellow who not only paid for the course and loves it and has been telling everybody under the sun to go buy it but who also is bleary-eyed from studying it during many late evening hours.

I was hoping someone might have an answer but it's been quite a while. By now I've already been learning in the school of hard knocks because I couldn't find the answers quickly enough here. I like the idea of making separate motions so that if (when) one is denied, the others still need a ruling. Still not sure about whether to file them at the same time and be done with it or wait and let them trickle in so they each get separate attention. In the last 5-6 weeks after posting this question to the forum, I've had a couple of cases where I tried both approaches and neither worked for me.

BTW: if anyone is able to point to where in the course this question is answered, I'm still open to input and I'd really appreciate it. I've been through a lot of sections -- I *thought* all of them, but the way the course navigation works, it is kind of hard to tell. And the search feature is worthless unless you are searching for a single word that's unique.
* Last updated by: B3 on 2/12/2017 @ 12:22 AM *

I like to file separate motions. Motion fees in New York is $45.

I file separate motions so that I can appeal the decision from the motion with the transcript.

For example, I filed a motion for a stay of any order. Then I filed a motion to vacate the same order.

Results, the stay order was granted in 30 days. The vacate order was denied 4 months later.

This is your decision.

Hello b3I just want to weight in and give you some encouragement. I also love the course Dr. Graves has provided us but I also find it hard to tell if I have completed every section. I also find that the answers to some of the questions are not so apparent in the course. So to just say read the course, isn't much help at times. You posting the questions you have, like you have here gives great insight to the application of the material and info in the course. Thank you for that.
File them separate in my opinion. More than one could be file the same day. The reason why I do this is because after a year of my word war in court. I find that it is much easier to research my own case with separate filed papers and clear filing dates. I simply started a folder titled filed papers . Then nested folders in it for each filed document date, I file. Like so;

Filed papers
1 filed 1-1-16
- Motion to dismiss
- first set of interrogators
2 filed 2-14-16
- Motion to allow public into the
courtroom
- Motion to video tape courtroom

3 filed 2-33-17
- affidavit ( about car)
ECT,ECT

This way I can easily see a time line of what has been done in my side of the case.
Hope it helps someone!
,

B3, I agree that the course "search" feature is mostly worthless and for the same reason you say. I've mentioned it in the forum, too, and in private email to Frederick Graves, years ago and some, but nothing has changed. It seems he doesn't want to outsource the project of making a fully valuable search "engine", making the course comparable to price and renewal.

I've made the same protest on answers such as you received. Seems quite rude to me, especially when we study WHILE under the gun. It seems FG isn't of a mind to get a few pro bono attorneys and paralegals involved to help in the forum. Their participation would truly benefit them by sharpening their sword with multiple situations needing their input as education not as representation.

Keep in mind that we are not working in courts of law, justice, and equity. I've discovered after 10 years of being kicked in the teeth, spit upon, and stomped on by lying lawyers and corrupt judges in false, fraudulent, wrongful (mildly put to avoid their criminality) foreclosure (NOT EVEN A DEFAULT!!!!!) and now facing false,lying unlawful unlawful detainer, is this: ITS ALL ABOUT COMMERCE. THESE COURTS ARE STRICTLY COURTS OF COMMERCE. COMMERCE IS ALL THEY CAN DEAL WITH. Their canons, their constitution, their jurisdictions, their statutes bind them, not you and me.

It's very odd that Frederick Graves does not, as far as I can discern, mention this extremely important jurisdictional point at the beginning of the course, or anywhere. The illusion is that these courts are courts of law, justice, and equity for the majority of course buyers; in fact they are not. They are ALL private corporation franchises of the commercial corporate "Government of the UNITED STATES DBA U S Government, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 20501" Dun & Bradstreet DUNS# 16-190-6193. A man may not know this until he swears presidential oath of loyalty to the private non-government Constitution OF the United States, NOT same as Constitution FOR the United States of America. Bless all.

The search function was never what we wanted, but we do not have and cannot find software to make a truly useful search function. As for getting pro bono lawyers into the forum, all they have to do is subscribe so they will have the same access you do. As for what the "courts" are, it seems to me the most important question is not "what" they are but HOW TO DEFEAT CROOKED LAWYERS AND CONTROL CORRUPT JUDGES AND GET JUSTICE. There is only one of me trying my best to give you my best for the past 20 years since I started this, and I will ALWAYS do my best to help everyone as much as time allows. Today, as a 74 year old man, I've worked to help others with their legal problems a full 12 hour day. Doing the best I can, friends. Sorry some of you don't think I do enough. I believe with all my heart there is not another course that comes anywhere close to mine when it comes to learning HOW the courts work. Others may like to assert how corrupt the courts are. THEY ARE CORRUPT MUCH OF THE TIME. So, I do my best to give you the best information I can give so YOU CAN FIX THE PROBLEMS. To expect more of me or to criticize me seems unjust. But, I love you all anyway. That's why the course exists!

Hello Beryl1,

I didn't ignore your private email, I've just been out of the country for the last few weeks. I replied back to you by private email in the forum.

I can't address your concerns in the open forum, because discussions outside of the course material is not allowed. But from reading your above message, it seems like you have a good grasp of the situation...being that it's all about COMMERCE!!

One of the powers that the PEOPLE gave the government in the Constitution, is the power to regulate commerce.

And as I stated before in the forum 27 CFR 72.11 converts nearly all crimes (Federal/State) to commercial crimes.

I know that I'm going to get backlash from voicing my opinion here, but it's my personal belief that most lower courts are not about finding justice...it's about commerce.

And in my experience, most cases which "appear" to be handled in a court, are actually Administrative Hearings of some governmental agency. Perfect example...the DMV. While you maybe in a "courtroom"...you are not actually in an Article III Judicial Court. It's a hearing conducted by an agency of the government.

And I also found it interesting that many so called "agencies of the government", have no Constitutional basis for its existence. It's the same for Executive Orders. You will find no authority for them under the Constitution... at least I haven't found authority yet.

I sympathize with your frustration, but to be fair, Dr. Graves can't fight your battles for you. And trying to lay a guilt trip upon him is not right. He's only providing you with some of the tools that you will need to fight your own battles. I have learned a lot from this course. But this course is NOT an end-all solution to all of people's problems...it's only the beginning of a long journey.

Best Wishes To All

Greetings All,

I file separately AND every filed document also contains this phrase: "1. The Defendants must file a traverse or demurrer under oath with specificity about the contents of this AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT or they are deemed admitted. 2. If any statement below is found to be incorrect or not standing in law the rest is in full force and effect."

I hesitated many years to buy into Dr. Graves course and it was a mistake. Less than a year ago I came in and have had a great increase of my education from his course. I have posted some of my materials and the latest is really sound and law/case based.

I would like to see a FILE for such documents, but I'm sure it would be tough for Dr. Graves to study each document for approval to place into the file.

In Yah's service, Karl